<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Barons of the Galaxy Forum - Feature Requests - Item Names - Messages</title>
<link>http://forum.baronsofthegalaxy.com/topic2619-item-names.aspx</link>
<description>Barons of the Galaxy Forum - Feature Requests - Item Names - Messages</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>Jitbit AspNetForum</generator>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 09:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 09:06:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<link>http://forum.baronsofthegalaxy.com/topic2619-item-names.aspx</link>
<title>Message from Doctor Dread</title>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Zip555</b> wrote:<br/><blockquote>The Assets display can be long and hard to find things, as there are so many Raws and components.<br/>If raws/components were named differently it would be much easier so see what a component factory or mine should be set to produce.<br/>Instead of Basic Chemical and Rare chemical, calling them Chemical Rare and chemical basic, then sorting alpabetically, would group each type of raw/component together.<br/><br/>Final product is a bit more difficult, bit if they could start with a short prefix for their group it would work well.</blockquote><br/><br/>I was totally going to bring this up weeks ago =)<br/><br/>I'm not sure if we should format it differently or just turn the words around though<br/><br/>Chemical (Rare)<br/>Chemical - Rare<br/>Chemical Rare<br/><br/><br/>I also want to change some of the big words to smaller ones like <br/><br/>Experimental =&gt; Neo<br/>Advanced = &gt;Hyper<br/><br/>to save space on the long names]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 09:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://forum.baronsofthegalaxy.com/topic2619-item-names.aspx</link>
<title>Message from Zip555</title>
<description><![CDATA[The Assets display can be long and hard to find things, as there are so many Raws and components.<br/>If raws/components were named differently it would be much easier so see what a component factory or mine should be set to produce.<br/>Instead of Basic Chemical and Rare chemical, calling them Chemical Rare and chemical basic, then sorting alpabetically, would group each type of raw/component together.<br/><br/>Final product is a bit more difficult, bit if they could start with a short prefix for their group it would work well.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 04:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
